the storied jesus

exploring the Jesus of the Story.

« Back to blog

Creation, Fall, & Redemption

As previously noted, I wanted to throw out some thoughts regarding the meta-narrative themes or structures that we see in Scripture, namely, Creation, Fall and Redemption. It is virtually impossible to approach Scripture without presuppositions, and if that is the case, we might as well have some good ones. We don't want to read Scripture through the lens of Darwinian Evolution (albeit that would be highly entertaining), so we must choose wisely how we approach Scripture. The question of interpretation is a question I am unwilling to visit at this point because it is beyond the scope of this post and quite frankly beyond the scope of everyone because it is a difficult issue (maybe for another time!). Nevertheless, we plow forward.

I am currently reading through a 25-page paper about heaven and the Biblical Story of Redemption. Ask your average Joe-the-sit-in-the-pew-Christian if he is going to heaven when he dies and he will say, without hesitation, "yes." But can he articulate what happens next? Are we to just sit in heaven outside of our bodies while the Earth remains in limbo? I think not. Nor does this particular author. Nor does Scripture because Scripture is way better than that. Don't misread me here. Being in heaven with God for eternity is absolutely the best thing that could happen to us pathetic sinners. But what happens to the Earth? Is Redemption simply for the 'soul' and the rest of non-human 'stuff' gets thrown away? Is the New Testament even concerned primarily with getting people 'to heaven'?

Having a sound understanding of the narrative of Scripture is important. Something we see throughout all of Scripture is the theme of Creation,Fall, & Redemption. It's a pattern that is linked and buried underneath all of the major turning points in the Story. Genesis 1, we see Creation. Genesis 3, Fall. The following unfolding events thereafter are somewhat cyclical in nature (Exile, etc.), while God intervenes with Redemptive tendencies (a la Abraham, David, etc.). All of it points to Jesus and is ultimately fulfilled (or 'completed') in Him. But it doesn't stop there!

Eschatology is important. It's difficult, but it's important. It's important because it is a part of Scripture, therefore we ought to study it. We don't divide over it or split churches over it. We talk about it, pray over it and talk about it some more while we study our brains out. But what we need to include in our scholarly work in Eschatology is a deeper grasp of these themes as they unfold. We don't just get snatched away never to return. EVERYTHING is going to be Redeemed! Human and non-human. There will be a new Heavens and Earth (Revelation is all pointing to this!). (You can read the article I linked above to read more about this).

My point is this. Does your Scripture reading include these themes? Do we look to them as places to hang our hats on throughout the narrative? Or do we just read Scripture to see what something could mean for me today while completely ripping it out of context thus negating the intent of narrative and story (1 Chronicles 4:10 is a good example of this)? I'm challenged and wonder what you think.

Dec 31, 2008
Foolish Sage said...
The Middleton article didn't take me any place
I hadn't already gone to, but it is a great starting place for dealing with the main texts that touch on the eternal destiny of the believer as well as the purpose of and destiny of the whole creation. He successully challenges the whole common notion that the goal of the Christian life is to "go to heaven."

This is more than an academic interest. As Tom Wright has pointed out in Surprised by Hope and elsewhere, what we believe about the present creation and its destiny has a real bearing on how we live our lives.
Dec 31, 2008
Jason Garwood said...
I think that your analysis is dead on. The article would be a HUGE wake-up call for some in my context and really for a lot of people that I know.

And you are right in saying that it is more than an academic interest. It is most assuredly going to guide/inform what we do now!
Jan 01, 2009
Emery said...
Middleton is one of my profs and he is unbelievable. He has two books, The Transforming Vision and Truth is Stranger than it Used to Be, with a third, his dissertation on the imago Dei, coming soon. For someone like me, and I assume somewhat like you, who has grown up and gone to a college steeped in dispensationalism his arguments are pretty eyeopening. For instance, he doesn't believe in the rapture. Also, he doesn't think that the snake in the garden was Satan. In class a little while ago, I asked a question concerning NT Wright and he said that NT stole the idea in question from his coauthor, Brian Walsh. Hmm...interesting, huh? Any questions let me know.
Jan 02, 2009
Foolish Sage said...
I plan to read Transforming Vision as soon as I can get my hands on a copy, thanks to this excellent recommendation by Daniel Kirk: http://cli.gs/tJe6LB
Jan 10, 2009
Blendah Tom said...
Matt Chandler preached a great sermon on this subject but "Restoration" was the word he used after creation / fall / redemption/

http://www.thevillagechurch.net/resources/documents/20070121truth.pdf